GUI: fritz 11
opening book: perfect 2010
Child process priority for Rybka 4: Normal
Hash size: 319 mb
Large pages for Rybka 4: disabled
CPU: AMD X2 3800+(~2 GHz)
Permanent brain: disabled
Use tablebases: enabled
Blitz:1'+30"
1 Deep Rybka 4 w32 1½10½½ 3.5/6
2 Houdini 1.03a w32 2_CPU 0½01½½ 2.5/6
Next time, without tablebases:
1 Deep Rybka 4 w32 ½½1½½½ 3.5/6
2 Houdini 1.03a w32 2_CPU ½½0½½½ 2.5/6
10 games maybe not sufficient, but it seems to me that Rybka 4 is stronger in long time control.
In these games i see that Houdini 1.03a has a bad time management and don't use it's time. For example while Rybka has 38 seconds to think(in the middle of game), Houdini has more than 4 minutes! It is strange that such very strong engine hasn't good time management!
I should run some different tests.
However Rybka 4 is stronger in these games.
good luck
In these games i see that Houdini 1.03a has a bad time management and don't use it's time. For example while Rybka has 38 seconds to think(in the middle of game), Houdini has more than 4 minutes! It is strange that such very strong engine hasn't good time management!
I should run some different tests.
However Rybka 4 is stronger in these games.
good luck
